From @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Wed Sep 22 16:40:54 1999 +1200
Status: 
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:
>From @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@  Wed Sep 22 18:58:12 1999
Received: from burger.forfree.at (burger.forfree.at [206.161.237.241])
	by ark.listquest.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA02336
	for <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:57:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (from mdom@localhost)
	by burger.forfree.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA05960
	for 1997120709; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:39:52 +0200
Received: from sys32.hou.wt.net (sys32.hou.wt.net [205.230.159.32])
	by burger.forfree.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA05956
	for <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:39:50 +0200
Received: from default (208-245-148-237.ipset5.wt.net [208.245.148.237])
	by sys32.hou.wt.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA09397
	for <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 17:00:21 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>
X-Sender: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:40:54 -0500
To: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
From: Hugh Chandler <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>
Subject: Re: (Off Topic ) Re: [Notator] SM124 Monitor 
In-Reply-To: <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>
References: <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>
 <000801bf03e0$30042980$d91b62cb@jon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
X-header: ---------------------------------------------------------------
X-header: Notator web page: <http://members.forfree.at/~notator/>
X-header: List-unsubscribe: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ "unsubscribe notator"
X-header: List address:     @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
X-header: Problems:         @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

   *[Notator SL mailing list]*
At 01:31 PM 9/22/99 -0400, you wrote:

I have two monitors, both SM124's, one with a larger image (found it at
Goodwill for $5) and my old one with the usual smaller image size. Let me
tell you, bigger is better! I don't notice much reduction of sharpness in
the larger size image, but it is much easier to read. I may try to adjust
my old monitor too, now that you guys have explained how to do it.
Hugh
>What you're saying is true. When the electron bean is spread over a larger
>area ( increased picture size ), you are really just spreading the electron
>beam over a larger area. However, this will result in a proportional drop in
>light output as the beam energy is dissipated over a larger area. Turning up
>the brightness level on the monitor should solve the brightness issue but
>please bear in mind that a bright display is the direct result of a dense
> and usually broader ) electron beam. A broader electron beam cannot
>reproduce the same high frequency components as a thinner beam. In other
>words, you may have a larger display, but the resolution of the image may
>have descreased. Individuals may have to decide whether they prefer a large
>display over a sharp display.
>
>This is
>Bill
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: John Sweden <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>
>

   * To unsubscribe from this list, send an email with the        *
   * mesage:   unsubscribe notator                                *
   *     to:   @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@                        *
   * DO NOT use the list address @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@  *
   * In case of problems contact: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ *