From @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Wed Jan 28 14:24:54 2004 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by gem.win.co.nz (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) id OAA28093 for notator-list; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:24:54 +1300 Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.87]) by gem.win.co.nz (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28090 for <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:24:44 +1300 Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i0S12c29010856 for <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.7] (65.137-pool-xdsl-mi.sccoast.net [66.153.137.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id i0S12S28009555 for <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:02:34 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:02:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [NSL] NAMM and Mac????? From: Craig Beaumont <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@> To: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Org" <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@> Message-ID: <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@> In-Reply-To: <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Precedence: bulk Reply-To: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ X-header: --------------------------------------------- X-header: Unsubscribe : @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ X-header: Notator WWW : http://www.notator.org X-header: List problems: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ X-header: --------------------------------------------- [Notator/Creator SL mailing list] On 1/27/04 10:11 AM, "Jamm!n Wheeler" <@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@> wrote: > Looks like porting to MacOSX is already well underway. That's what I > mean by it would seem to be a waste of resources for Apple to write > something of their own in this vein, as opposed to (say) contributing > some funds and development effort to Ardour instead. It would *very* > much be in their interests to do that, because Linux is unlikely to > ever replace Macs in pro studios, but it *could* replace Windows in > home studios... VERY cool! Will definitely keep an eye on this. >>> and Ardour. Of course as a sequencer platform it still doesn't compete >>> with the ST :) >> >> But when we say "doesn't compete with the ST", I hope >> you agree that we are being fondly nostalgic, > > No, read carefully. I'm talking about Linux specifically, I know what your talking about..was quoting you ...perhaps didn't make myself clear. What I was/am talking about is that the ST, not Linux, isn't in the position to compete with anything. Competition requires action and often reaction! > that Linux does not compete with the ST as a sequencer platform at > the moment. There are a few sequencers to choose from but they are > not yet of sufficient quality to satisfy me. Let alone good enough > and flexible enough and with the right modus operandi to tempt me away > from Notator. > ST/Notator has indeed set a high standard. > I have no nostalgic attachment to the ST whatsoever I do, but I'm just that type of guy. I've spent a LOT of hours with the ST/Notator combination...6 nights/week...300 + days/yr...MANY years! :-) > > Sure, eventually the world will run out of STs. But I've got 2 spares, > and currently there are plenty to be had off eBay for two a penny. Of > greater concern in the meantime is running out of dongles/Log3s/Unitors, > so we continue to push for NSL to be open sourced. > Well, sold the Log3 a year ago, but I still have an extra dongle if you are ever in need. One's sufficient for me, now. > To take your metaphor: Those who stay close to the surface of the sand > are the ones who have a perpetual fear of being buried... got to keep > moving, keep upgrading, to stay afloat. Me and my Atari, well, we're > in an underground bunker, watching the shifting sands above our heads > through a little window, but immune to their effects... until either > (a) I spy a favourable current and decide to leave, or (b) the weight > of the sand becomes too much and the bunker starts to collapse. I'm > hoping (a) will happen before (b) [the latter ought to be at least > another decade away yet], but I have a little escape plan ready > just in case... ...time and place for everything under the sun. Sounds like you're practicing good wisdom. Craig _______________________________________________________ | Unsubscribe from the list? send the words: | | UNSUBSCRIBE NOTATOR to: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ | -------------------------------------------------------